Daily Archives: November 3, 2013

I’m getting a new bike (with picture)

I’m getting a new bike from Oak Cliff Cargo Bikes (est. 2012) to replace Blue and Gigi. What I’m getting is a Clyde cargo-only version of

this bike Bonnie cargo bike

in a similar color scheme. My bike will have a slightly more vertical rear wall on the box and darker stain on the woodwork. And there will be a graphic similar to the header on this blog on the side of the box.

So, this new bike will need a name. At the moment I don’t know if this bike will have a feminine personality like Gigi, or a more masculine personality like Blue. I won’t know until I get the bike in my hands. So at this point boy, girl, or androgynous names are all equally accepted as suggestions.

PSA, Opus


S&M and a fair(er) tax structure on a Wreck-Free Sunday

I know where some readers’ minds went with that headline, and you’re only partially right. The current tax structure is like a master/slave relationship gone toxic, rife with abuse. But the S’s and M’s in this discussion have only technical meaning, not that kind of meaning.

What I came up with is a tax structure based on making things vs. making money. I am of the opinion that making things contributes to the overall good of society, where (just) making money has come perilously close to destroying the economy at least twice in a century that is not quite 13 years old. I am basing part of my tax structure on the “Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon” game. People and businesses would be classified on a 6 step scale based on how far they were from a sellable product. S0 people and businesses would be the actual products themselves, people would pay to watch these people or companies working. Examples would be musicians, athletes, actors and actresses, performing artists of all stripes for the “people” side of the formula, and the venues they perform in for the companies side. Texas Stadium and Charlotte Motor Speedway would be examples of S0 companies. At the other end of the scale you would have S5 people and companies that exist only to make money by moving money around, like your typical Wall Street bank CEO and the banks they run.

The M in this case stands for Minimum wage and multiples thereof. This would be used to determine tax brackets in the various categories, with M1 being a person making minimum wage 40 hours a week and never getting a week off, roughly $15k at today’s minimum wage. The top tax bracket is M250, the person in this bracket makes as much in a single day as someone on minimum wage makes in an entire year. Depending on your S classification the marginal tax rate at this level would be anywhere from 50% to 99% when all the taxes are added together. Currently people in the M1 bracket pay 15.3% with no deductions in the form of SS and Medicare taxes, and I don’t see that changing either. If the Social Security tax goes up the income tax would decline the same amount, and not just at this level but all tax brackets.

Now how this would work in the real world is where the going gets squidgey. At the ends it’s quite simple, S0 and S5 persons and companies are easy to figure out. It’s the S3 and S4 companies that are difficult to classify. S1 are people and companies that make actual physical products, the kind that take lots of investments of capital to create the workspace and education and effort on the part of the worker to create the product. Engineers and designers and assembly line workers are S1 people, and I think it’s pretty obvious what the S1 companies are, the Fords, Trek Bicycles, any farm, any restaurant, any grocery store… S2 companies would be the transportation companies, trucking and shipping firms. They can have S1 employees like truck drivers and loaders and longshoremen, but the company is still 2 degrees removed from the actual product. Still vital to the economy, but not actually making things so taxed slightly higher than the people that make things. It all works out in the end as other taxes on companies like this would be reduced because the income taxes would be covering their external costs better. S2 people would be managers and supervisors, people not actually on the line but who interact with the people on the line. S3 people are the supervisors and managers of the people that supervise and manage the people on the line that actually make the products. As the distance between the product and the person grows, so do their taxes. It’s the current money-making champs that have me confuzzled, the mining and extraction companies. These companies make huge financial gambles on if the stuff they are looking for is at the location they are looking in. But at the same time these efforts have high external costs that are not currently being borne by the companies but rather are forced upon the people that live nearby or in some cases get their water from the area being mined. These companies would be in the S3 and S4 status. They don’t actually “make” the product, but they aren’t that far removed from the product. And I guess the refining process would have to be classified as S1, but with the external costs assessed at the extraction point of the raw materials. Moving on recyclers and waste collectors and processors would also be S1, dealing directly with the product but on the other end of the life cycle. Recycling and waste processing are messy but necessary parts of the economy, and as bad as they are things would be much worse without them. Think ecology, without carrion eaters of all sizes we would be up to our butts (and beyond) in deceased critters. Recyclers and waste processors do the same thing for the economy. Retailers would also be an S1 classification with most of the supply chain being S2. They don’t make it or sell it they just move it and store it between the makers and the sellers.

And most if not all upper management of any company would be the S5 workers for the company, people 5 or more levels removed from the actual product design or manufacture. The decider would be time making vs time telling people what to make and deciding where to make it, if you spend more than 50% of your time at work actually making things then you would be S1, so line supervisors who actually run machines as well as do work schedules and deploy workers to their work stations would be S1, but line supervisors that just walk up and down the line rarely if ever touching the product or the machines that make the product would be S2, and the supervisor for either one would be S3 as there would be two people between him and the product. Again the squidgey part is the person at the bottom of an S5 company, as they don’t have an actual product but don’t supervise anyone either. Just on General Principle I would say anyone at an S5 corporation is an S5 worker, to discourage people from wanting to work in S5 corporations.

And that’s how things would be if I was running this popsicle stand.

PSA, Opus